Thursday, August 4, 2016

Is a “Growth Mindset” Enough?

The world only cares about—and pays off on—what you can do with what you know (and it doesn’t care how you learned it). (2)

The quote above from a Thomas Friedman article on what Google looks for employees is one that has stuck with me.  It was a huge reason why I wrote “The Innovator’s Mindset” in the first place.

Yet this post was sparked by some conversations as well as this blog post by Adam Schoenbart comparing my book to E.D. Hirsch’s book from 1987, “Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know”.  Here is one of the passages from Adam’s blog:

Couros argues that “We are spending so much time telling our students about what they can’t do that we have lost focus on what we can do” (p. 7), to which Hirsh would counter: “Our children can learn this information only by being taught it” (p. 14). What and how seem to be at odds in this dynamic. Hirsh’s views on the limited potential of students are definitely problematic, writing, “Left to itself, a child will not grow into a thriving creature” (p. 31). Really!?!

While Hirsh wants students to simply memorize 150-pages-or-so of definitive knowledge and ideas, Corous seeks to expand worldviews: “Innovation demands that our students learn the basics, but how we go about teaching them may look different than in years past. The basics are crucial, but they cannot be the only things we teach our students” (p. 163). What we teach our students is crucial to both authors as information is key in both texts.

Adam goes on to wonder what Hirsch’s viewpoints would be almost 30 years after this book where information is abundant:

Again for Hirsh, it’s about information first and foremost. With limited flexibility, he wants to tell America what to learn, to which Couros would likely respond: “You’ll learn that to truly empower people, there must be a shift from telling to listening” (p. 7). One can’t help but wonder how Hirsh’s views may have evolved in the new reality of technology and access to information.

Carol Dweck’s “Mindset” is one book that really pushed my thinking over the past few years.  The language we use when working with our students is crucial in how we help them develop.  In this post sharing 25 quotes from the book, here are some that stuck out to me:

Test scores and measures of achievement tell you where a student is, but they don’t tell you where a student could end up. – Carol Dweck

Just because some people can do something with little or no training, it doesn’t mean that others can’t do it (and sometimes do it even better) with training. – Carol Dweck

Wow, that’s a really good score. You must have worked really hard. – Carol Dweck

What did you learn today? What mistake did you make that taught you something? What did you try hard at today? – Carol Dweck

Although I am just sharing a bit of the book, these quotes scream “SCHOOL!” to me, not necessarily empowered learning.

Take the last quote shared in the group above.

What did you learn today? What mistake did you make that taught you something? What did you try hard at today? – Carol Dweck

What if it was changed to this?

What did you learn today? What ideas do you have moving forward because of what you learned? What will you create from this?

Both quotes are focused on learning, but in one case, the learning is extended.  This quote from “The Center for Accelerated Learning” shares the importance of creation for learning:

Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 8.00.02 PM

 

So let’s go back to the title of this post; Is a “Growth Mindset” Enough?

My short answer (obviously) is no.  That doesn’t mean it is irrelevant, but I see it as more of a continuum.  Knowledge and information are crucial to creation; they are not separated.  But my hope is to go beyond kids being “good at school” and the learning that we decide is important for them.

It is about going further with learning, to help kids (and ourselves) become creators, inventors, and innovators.

A simple analogy to explain mindset from my book:

Let’s take the simple example of playing the piano to compare the two ideas. With a fixed mindset, the learner doesn’t believe he or she has the ability to play the piano. With a growth mindset, the learner believes that, with hard work and practice, the opportunity to play the piano is within the realm of his or her ability. That belief leads the learner to try and, ultimately, grow.

The innovator’s mindset takes the growth mindset a step further by focusing on using one’s ability to learn to play the piano to create music.

As I go to many sessions at conferences, I often wonder if the focus is on how to help student’s become strong at “school”, or to truly empower them as learners and creators.  Do we want students to learn math or be able to do things with the math they have learned?  As Friedman states, what we do with what we know is what will separate us today in a world where information is abundant.



from Connected Principals http://ift.tt/2apu1To

White Wine Slushy

This Moscato peach wine slushy is the perfect way to beat the summer heat. Loaded with fresh peaches and sweet Moscato, this white wine slushy is going to be your new favorite summer beverage.

A white wine slushy is the perfect way to beat the summer heat. Loaded with fresh peaches and sweet Moscato, this slushy is going to be your new favorite summer beverage. So refreshing.

This is a sponsored post on behalf of Evite® in partnership with Cavit Wine. All opinions are my own. Thank you for supporting the brands that continue to make My Baking Addiction possible.

I don’t know what the weather is like in your area, but it has been blazing hot here in Ohio. So hot, that instead of seeing little sunshines or clouds on my weather app, I’m seeing a little cactuses.

(more…)

The post White Wine Slushy appeared first on My Baking Addiction.

        


from My Baking Addiction http://ift.tt/2axNNzi

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

“Did you fail school or did school fail you?”

compliance does not foster innovation

Have you ever heard, or even said, “The bell doesn’t dismiss you. I dismiss you.”  I know I have early on in my career.

That line is not about empowerment, let alone engagement. It is strictly about compliance.  More on this in a bit.

This snippet of an interview from Gary Vaynerchuk and Larry King, is a very short, and powerful watch about the compliance we ask from our students:

The quote that struck me is, “Did you fail school or did school fail you?”

Some thoughts on this video:

John Spencer made the following comment:

I get so tired of hearing about all the ways that “school is failing.” How about we celebrate the innovation that’s already happening in our schools? How about we highlight the creative ways teachers are raising up the next generation of entrepreneurs?

I agree with a lot of what he says.  Most of our focus needs to be on an abundance mentality, yet I think some times these “jolts” are needed.  These things  and thinking might be happening in many classrooms, but do you is it the majority?

When Gary talks about his concern for the entrepreneurs he is look to hire being too good at school, I have had the same concern when hiring teachers. If they mastered “school” as students, will they be more reluctant to changing it to something better? It is hard to challenge what worked for some, to create something better for all.  I have really tried to catch myself from saying things like, “our smartest students”, and replacing that with “our smartest academic students”.  They don’t necessarily mean the same thing, and we have to be able to find those gifts in each of our students.

The other thing that really pushed my thinking is when Gary talks about people not being able to take that “punch in the mouth” from a market. Do we create opportunities for students to take their ideas beyond school? I have happened across to many students who have done amazing things in spite of school, not because of it. Their “free time” is where they become entrepreneurs, developers, innovators, and inventors.  This is not necessarily promoted unless there is a specific course for this within your school.

Back to the “bell doesn’t dismiss you” comment.  Do you think if learners were truly engrossed in what they are doing, would the bell even matter?

By the way, why do we have bells in schools still?

This would be a great video to discuss with your staff and how we encourage kids to push outside those lines, because the world might not necessarily be asking for it, but it definitely needs it.

 

Source: George Couros



from Connected Principals http://ift.tt/2b40kcl

“Did you fail school or did school fail you?”

compliance does not foster innovation

Have you ever heard, or even said, “The bell doesn’t dismiss you. I dismiss you.”  I know I have early on in my career.

That line is not about empowerment, let alone engagement. It is strictly about compliance.  More on this in a bit.

This snippet of an interview from Gary Vaynerchuk and Larry King, is a very short, and powerful watch about the compliance we ask from our students:

The quote that struck me is, “Did you fail school or did school fail you?”

Some thoughts on this video:

John Spencer made the following comment:

I get so tired of hearing about all the ways that “school is failing.” How about we celebrate the innovation that’s already happening in our schools? How about we highlight the creative ways teachers are raising up the next generation of entrepreneurs?

I agree with a lot of what he says.  Most of our focus needs to be on an abundance mentality, yet I think some times these “jolts” are needed.  These things  and thinking might be happening in many classrooms, but do you is it the majority?

When Gary talks about his concern for the entrepreneurs he is look to hire being too good at school, I have had the same concern when hiring teachers. If they mastered “school” as students, will they be more reluctant to changing it to something better? It is hard to challenge what worked for some, to create something better for all.  I have really tried to catch myself from saying things like, “our smartest students”, and replacing that with “our smartest academic students”.  They don’t necessarily mean the same thing, and we have to be able to find those gifts in each of our students.

The other thing that really pushed my thinking is when Gary talks about people not being able to take that “punch in the mouth” from a market. Do we create opportunities for students to take their ideas beyond school? I have happened across to many students who have done amazing things in spite of school, not because of it. Their “free time” is where they become entrepreneurs, developers, innovators, and inventors.  This is not necessarily promoted unless there is a specific course for this within your school.

Back to the “bell doesn’t dismiss you” comment.  Do you think if learners were truly engrossed in what they are doing, would the bell even matter?

By the way, why do we have bells in schools still?

This would be a great video to discuss with your staff and how we encourage kids to push outside those lines, because the world might not necessarily be asking for it, but it definitely needs it.

 



from Connected Principals http://ift.tt/2aIeFfo

Newsletter Samples for Improving Your Communication

Yesterday, a principal who heard me speak at the USA Conference in Wichita, Kansas, emailed me. She asked asked if I had samples of some the newsletters I share with my parents, students, or teachers. As you’re starting out another school year, one way to showcase the positive happenings in your building is by consistently […]

from Connected Principals http://ift.tt/2av5EXB

The City Baker's Guide to Country Living by Louise Miller

I've been itching to read this novel for a few months.  I'm a sucker for my foodie novels, and this one didn't disappoint.  I was certainly in the mood for a novel that was gentle, full of warm characters, and set in a lovely little town.  Toss in some incredible desserts that made my mouth water, and I was a happy camper this weekend reading Louise Miller's debut novel.  

Olivia is a very talented pastry chef working at an exclusive club in Boston.  She's also having an affair with Jamie, a much older married man who is a big wig at the club.  One night at a huge party, she accidentally drops a flaming Baked Alaska and starts a fire at the club.  Oops.  Seeing this as an excuse to leave a messy situation, she flees to Guthrie, Vermont to visit her best friend Hannah.  At loose ends, Olivia applies for the pastry chef job at the Sugar Maple Inn, owned by the cranky Margaret.  Olivia soon settles into her job, acting non-committal but knowing deep down in her bones that she wants to stay in Guthrie.  Olivia and her dog Salty become involved with the McCracken family, who represent everything Olivia has always yearned for in her life.  Martin McCracken is not the usual type Olivia goes for; he is kind,  kinda cute, and an excellent fiddle player.  But his home is in Seattle, and he doesn't plan on remaining in Guthrie forever. 

Olivia is a bit of a square peg in Guthrie.  She dyes her hair fantastical colors, drinks, and has no problem standing up for herself. You get a sense that Guthrie used to be a very conservative town, but seems to have loosened up.  But the same families have lived there for decades, and past loves, slights, and hurts still simmer under the surface.  Small town life will always be one where everyone knows your business all the time.  Olivia is used to living anonymously in a large city.  It's a bit of an adjustment. 

There is romance, heartbreak, friendship, sadness, and oodles of baking in this novel.  I'm pretty sure I'll have to have some apple pie very soon.  As you'll see, it plays a big part in the life of this town.   There aren't any surprises in this novel, and that's alright with me.  Sometimes a gal just needs a good read that, at the turn of the last page, puts a smile on her face and a bit of sadness in saying goodbye to Olivia and Guthrie, Vermont.  

A huge thank you to Pamela Dorman books/Viking for providing a review copy of this book.  It made my day to receive this book in the mail. 

This novel will be on sale nationwide on August 9th in hardcover, e-book, and audio.  




from Bookalicious Babe Book Reviews http://ift.tt/2ahczFh

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Is There A Real Estate Bubble In Vancouver?

 

 

 

The Media Has Talked About It For Months

Is There A Vancouver Real Estate Bubble?

What Are The Economic Factors Behind It?

Why Have The Prices Gone Up So Much?

 

There are a number of factors that speak to where the Vancouver Real Estate Market is going.  Some say it’s overpriced, some say it’s unsustainable, some say there’s a bubble.  

Here are a few key points I’d like to point out:

  • Late 2014/Early 2015, Government CANCELLED the Immigration Investment Program which basically allowed foreigners to come to Canada, give the government $800,000 as an interest free loan, wait a few years, and then they’d get their Permanent Residency status along with the money back
    • The RESULT:  initial panic by those NOT in the real estate industry, but many experts in the real estate industry said that this wasn’t going to affect the market a whole lot as it targeted the extremely wealthy foreigners and that it may slow down the market for the extremely high end homes in the $5M plus range.  Currency was still good, in the end, it didn’t affect the market.
  • My Understanding of the China Market:  when China’s economy is doing well, people go abroad and buy real estate property in Canada, US and Australia, when China’s economy IS NOT doing well, they do the same thing.  

The post Is There A Real Estate Bubble In Vancouver? appeared first on Gary Wong Realty Vancouver, BC.



from Gary Wong Realty Vancouver, BC http://ift.tt/2aRq10b